Mitigation occurs when the party suffering a loss in an insurance claim takes reasonable steps to avoid additional losses. Damage mitigation is an affirmative defense. The defendant has the burden of showing that you did not make every reasonable effort to mitigate your losses. 3.When a person claims the right to recover damages, the law imposes an obligation on the claimant to mitigate those damages.
This means that someone who has suffered a loss or injury should take reasonable opportunities to reduce the amount of harm suffered. While this principle applies to a variety of civil cases, there are some notable situations where the principle of harm mitigation arises in a personal injury case. Damage mitigation is a concept of contract law that requires the victim of a contract conflict to minimize damages resulting from a breach of contract. When a person suffers harm due to a breach of contract, they have a legal obligation to minimize the consequences and losses resulting from the injury and to mitigate attempts to deny recovery from any damage that could have been reasonably avoided.
The harm mitigation doctrine, also known as the avoidable consequences doctrine, prevents the injured party from recovering damages that could have been avoided through reasonable efforts. The defense generally invokes the doctrine of harm mitigation to reduce or eliminate any compensation for damages. When the plaintiff fails to mitigate their damages and the defendant shows that the plaintiff failed to take reasonable steps to reduce their losses after the injury, the court will reduce the plaintiff's damages by the amount that the plaintiff could have avoided or mitigated. If you have been injured in a collision with a motor vehicle and you have doubts about how the principle of harm mitigation will be applied in your case, you should consult a personal injury lawyer who will assess your situation and guide you in asserting your claim for damages.
In this case, the principle of damage mitigation is established to require you to resolve your claim for property damage without unnecessary delay, so as to reduce the amount of storage fees incurred. Personal injury lawyers are experienced in handling disputes when the principle of mitigation of damages is affirmed as a defense and advise their clients so that they are not adversely affected by the principle of mitigation of harm. If a person has a duty to mitigate damages and doesn't, courts often reduce their damages by the amount they could have mitigated. The term mitigating damages refers to a very common doctrine in civil and contractual liability legislation according to which the plaintiff's monetary recovery (resulting from an injury or a breach of contract) can be reduced to the extent that the plaintiff could have taken reasonable steps to avoid or “mitigate” their damages.
If you've been in a car accident, your first introduction to the principle of damage mitigation usually comes with your property damage claim.
